The G-word has been at it again. Mel Gibson has been letting off a bit of racist steam near a tape recorder. This is from Huff Post (quoting an article on radaronline):
His abusive and disgusting rant was caught on audio tape and includes a wish that the mother of his infant daughter be “raped by a pack of [N-words]”
– now is it just me or does that seem an impossible muddle of language. Do “N-words” travel in packs? Can an N-word rape? Raped by a word. Mel Gibson didn’t say “N-word”. (Imagine if he did: it would be a kind of PC-racism). What I find strange (from my sofa in the UK) is that they can’t simply star the offending word, like they do c*nt (sorry, c**t) in the very next sentence:
Mel also calls Oksana a whore and a c**t while their baby screams in the background…
What about “n*****”? Which is at least closer, typographically, to what Mel yelled. Or “N*****” if you want to serious-up the insult with a capital. (Did Mel yell it with a capital? He seems to have, judging from “N-words”. But is the capitalization paying too much respect to the insult? Does it make it more insulting…?)
Also, “whore” is neither given an asterisk or the ultimate honour of a W-word contraction. Same with “rape”. Is rape not offensive? Why not R-worded by a pack of N-words? Or raped by an N-bomb. Mel didn’t said “N-bomb” as much as he said “N-word”. And being raped by a bomb seems somehow nastier, and truer to the nastiness of the original yelling.
Obama on the Recession
Interesting use of tenses here from the President:
“As I’ve said before, it took us many more months to fully dig ourselves out of a recession that we now know was even deeper than anyone thought. But I will continue to work every single day and take every step that’s necessary to make sure that happens.”
In other words: thanks heavens it’s all fully over now soon we hope.
Joe the Whapsnatcher (part 2)
The headline reads: Joe The Plumber Slurs Gay People: I Would Never Let “Queers” Near My Children.
Never. Obviously. He’s not an idiot. He knows how that stuff can spread.
It’s an interview with ‘Christianity Today’ (an oxymoron?), in which he says: “You know, God is pretty explicit in what we’re supposed to do–what man and woman are for.” Such a delightfully old school belief (barely registered as a belief) in the bible as a transparent & perfect conduit of the word of God. On which matter: “People don’t understand the dictionary–it’s called queer. Queer means strange and unusual.” His use of the word “dictionary” in that sentence is remarkable. It is functions in exactly the same UNTHINKING way as the words “the bible” do when used to mean the infallible and perfect transcription of God’s revelation … “the dictionary” is a thing which exists for Joe, like the Leaning Tower of Pisa, a particular thing, an AUTHORITY in a perfect unchanging (really) form, a taken-for-granted touchstone. A bible of words. You know… the dictionary. The dictionary says.
“Queer means strange and unusual.” Yes, and for a time it meant “drunk”. Likewise, the word “plumber” means someone who “plumbs the depths”. A bit like a whapsnatcher, but with smoother balls.

Art is hard
Joe the Whapsnatcher
Joe the Plumber… is he a character in Sarah Palin’s new porn film?
(And does his cousin from overseas, Joe le Taxi, get a go?)
I watched the debates last night, nervously, and am still clinging onto the £50 I’ve got riding on McCain. Joe the Plumber was a brilliant hook – not a “game-changer” exactly, more a “chapter-changer”. I wonder what they call these things? Tight, distracting, refocusing soundbites. Whapsnatchers, I think it might be… I’ll have to ask Steve Schmidt what they’re called.
ME: Steve.
STEVE SCHMIDT: Hi Charlie.
ME: These things…
STEVE SCHMIDT: Whapsnatchers?
ME: Yes, what’s the name for them?
STEVE SCHMIDT: Generally we call them “whapsnatchers”.
ME: Cool. Thanks Steve.
STEVE SCHMIDT: Not a problem.
So there we have it. I’m sure the Republicans are going to fire out a few more whapsnatchers like Joe before the lights finally come on at the Looney Toons disco. They’re going to have to, if I’m going to keep my McGarret.
Idly tennis surfing in afterglow of Nadal victory. Ended up on this page, documenting the quotations of Miloslav Mecir, who used to be one of my favourite players but on this evidence has yet to break into my top ten epigrammists. It’s hard to say which of these quotes I’m going to be using the most over the coming days:
“I had expected a close match, and I did not know how the first day would end. I’m glad Domino won the important first point.â€
“I had a feeling that this is our strongest team. I was very satisfied with both of our guys today.â€
“We saw three days of world-class tennis, and in the end the better team won. I congratulate Croatia.â€
“I have had a big problem with my back since Christmas. Doctors gave me some infusions but it did not help me a lot. I started with special exercises but doctors do not recommend a long flight.â€
As Miloslav Mecir says…..
What Nadal says to Federer, in Henman’s words: “If you go there I’m going to go for it from the word go.”
I’m watching this on a matchbox sized screen on the BBC website. It’s like being back in the 1950s. I’m sitting on two pillows. It’s that exciting. And I have a slightly low chair. Come on Rafa!
They don't write 'em like they used to
A book for Keith
Keith Richards, talking in the Sun today, says that between tours he likes to:
Go get a tan, lie on the beach, Wait for the tour to wear off. I’ve read every book ever written. I’m running out. Somebody please write one!
So Keith Richards has read every book. He needs more. Well, he’s is in luck… April sees the publication of Boundary Value Problems for Elliptic Systems by Wloka, Rowley and Lawruk, the aim of which is to algebraize Index Theory by means of pseudo-differential operators and methods in the spectral theory of matrix polynomials. I think Keith will particularly enjoy chapter 5, in which the authors employ Spectral Triples to untangle the problem of Vector Bundles. He’s been waiting for a new angle on that shit for years.